CONSUMER PREFERENCES
TOWARDS WATER PURIFIERS.
ABSTRACT
Clean water
is a matter of universal importance. Like air, water is not a choice: we need
it to survive. So it is deeply disturbing to learn that drinking water is the
main health hazard in India .
River water, well and Groundwater are the source of drinking water for more
than half the population, but is it always safe? Groundwater is not required to
be disinfected and can be tainted through improper wastewater disposal, septic
tank contamination, underground storage tank or landfill leaks or animal waste
disposal. Most city water uses treatment methods that were developed near the
turn of the 20th century. Even most bottled water is drawn from city sources
and not filtered in any way! No wonder millions of customers in India are
looking for ways to ensure the water they use in their homes is safe. Today
there are many kinds of home water filters and purifiers that can remove most
pollutants found in city water or from wells and streams. But deciding which model
is the most trustworthy takes time and research.
Ø The
factors which affect the purchase decision
Ø Buying
behavior of different segments
Ø Compare
the theoretical profile vis-à-vis actual consumer
Ø In-depth
analysis of important attributes, which can help in serving the customers
Ø To know the customers interactions
Ø To determine the customer
satisfaction level
Ø To understand brand
loyalty and reasons for brand preference
Ø This
project also studies brand awareness in this market.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
CHAPTER
|
PARTICULAR
|
PAGE NO:
|
|
Abstract
|
I
|
|
List
of tables
|
II
|
|
List
of charts
|
IV
|
1
|
Introduction
1.1 Introduction about the Industry
1.2 Background of the study
|
1
3
|
2
|
Main theme of
the Project
2.1
Introduction about the study
2.2
Statement of the problem
2.3
Objectives of the study
2.4
Scope of the study
2.5
Limitations of the study
2.6 Review of Literature
2.7
Research Methodology
|
9
15
15
15
15
16
18
|
3
|
Data Analysis and Interpretation
|
20
|
4
|
Findings
and suggestions
4.1 Findings
4.2 Suggestions
|
50
51
|
5
|
Conclusion
|
53
|
|
APPENDIX
|
|
|
REFERENCES
|
|
CHAPTER-I
1.1 INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE INDUSTRY
Water purifiers
are devices which remove micro organisms, pollutants or any other kind of
contamination from the surface water and make it secure and edible for human
consumption. A wide range of advanced technologies are utilized depending on
the availability of raw water supply, presence of pollutants, finance and
required standards for the purification of water. With more and
more Indians becoming aware of the hazards of drinking impure water, the demand
for effective water purifiers is growing rapidly. The majority of intestinal
disorders and infections are caused by water borne micro organisms. As a
result, the number of consumers looking for reliable purification options is
increasing not only in the metros but also in towns across India.
Tap water may
contain both biological and chemical contaminants. Biologically contaminated
water contains microbes such as viruses, which may result in minor to serious
infections, and bacteria and guardians that lead to stomach disorders. Common
causes of chemical contamination are improper treatment of industrial waste and
pesticide overspill. If chemically contaminated water is used regularly it
could lead to serious long term ailments. Boiling is one of the oldest methods
of purifying water and is said to kill most micro organisms. Candle water
filters are still used in many households across India. However, the pace of
life in urban India has quickened so incredibly over the last decade or so that
few householders now have the time to treat water manually. Also, mechanized
water purification systems are often considered more reliable as far as
eliminating micro organisms is concerned. How does one choose from the plethora
of technologies and brands now available in India? Which water purification
system would be best for you? The two parameters of selection here would be
degree of purification and price. Different technologies deliver differing
degrees of purity. Water may be purified using the following technologies:
- UV purification
- Reverse Osmosis
- Activated carbon filtering
2
- Distillation
- Electro deionization
Domestic water
purifiers usually use chemical purification, ultraviolet treatment and
filtration, or reverse osmosis. Major vendors include Eureka Forbes, Philips,
Hindustan Unilever, Whirlpool and Kent. Eureka Forbes is the overall market
leader. Others are Ion Exchange, Zeolite, Kenstar and Maharaja Whiteline.
Prices range from less than Rs.2000 to Rs. 25000.
Eureka Forbes’
Aquaguard is still the market leader. Aquaguard Classic is a UV purifier. Major
global player, Philips has also launched UV purifiers, which are selling well.
Purifiers that use ultraviolet technology are usually priced above Rs. 4000.
Those looking
for less expensive purifiers might want to consider chemical based purification
systems such as Hindustan Unilever’s Pureit and Eureka Forbes’ Aquasure both of
which are priced below Rs. 2000. They don’t run on electricity so power outages
and electricity bills are not a problem. Also, Pureit and Aquasure are reported
to be user friendly allowing customers to service the devices themselves. There
are several other resin based purifiers as well but these may not be as
effective as Pureit and Aquasure. Also, it is best to select a chemical
purifier that is capable of removing the chemicals that are used for
purification.
Reverse osmosis
(RO) based water purification systems are the most expensive and can cost up to
Rs. 25000. Major vendors of RO water purifiers include Kent and Eureka Forbes.
Whirlpool also markets RO purifiers and claims that its Purafresh brand not
only eliminates all micro organisms but chemical toxins as well. Consumers
living in areas that have hard water prefer RO water purifiers because they
remove not just biological impurities but improve taste and odour. Kent claims
that their patented Mineral RO technology, which combines RO and UV
sterilisation, not only removes biological impurities and chemical toxins but
retains essential minerals as well.You would be wise to select a brand that
comes with an adequate warranty and has a proven track record of efficient and
prompt after sales service. Whatever your budget, you can now find a suitable
water purifier to ensure safe drinking water that will protect you and your
family from water borne diseases.
3
1.2 Background of the
Study
Monsoons
which are the fear of water-borne diseases breaking out run high in both urban
and rural areas. Safe drinking water, thus, becomes a priority and this is a
cue for the Rs 600-crore domestic water purification industry to step up its
operations.
Not
surprisingly, various companies involved in water purification and water
treatment are aggressively marketing their products. But, in spite of the
tremendous potential for expansion and growth, the water purification industry
has not had an easy time, partly because a water purifier is still not
considered a customer durable and partly because of issues of pricing, low
margins and technology.
The
major players in this segment are market leader Eureka Forbes, Bajaj, Kenstar,
Moniba anand, Ion Exchange, Permionics India, Softel Machines and Sintex
Industries. Besides, there are a number of local and regional players in the
unorganized sector. As much as 75 per cent of the market is accounted for by
Eureka Forbes with its brand AquaGuard. The rest of the players are fighting
for the remaining 25 per cent of the market.
The
differentiating factor among various brands is the kind of technology being
used. Up to now, the ultra violet or the UV technology, used by companies like
Eureka Forbes, Sintex Industries and a several other smaller players, has been
the dominant technology. However, ultra filtration membrane technology and
reverse osmosis are now being used increasingly.
Adapting to local conditions
The
condition of the water and the kind of impurities determine the kind of
technology suitable for a particular area. There are three main kinds of
impurities — suspended particles, microbiological impurities (which include
bacteria, viruses and pyrogens), and excess dissolved salts."The ideal
water purification system should remove all three kinds of impurities; only
membrane technology guarantees that," UV oxidation is good at removing
dissolved organics and bacteria, but is poor at removing dissolved ionized
solids and gases, particulates and pyrogens. Ultra filtration membrane devices,
on the other hand, are excellent at removing
4
particulates,
bacteria, pyrogens and dissolved organics, though they are also poor at removing
dissolved ionised solids and gases."Explaining the difference, UV rays
passing through water render bacteria and viruses inert, but they do not remove
them. Moreover, UV rays do not change the composition of the water; the excess
dissolved salts remain in your drinking water, as before. A UV-based water
purifier requires certain clarity of water for it to be effective. If the water
is turbid, then a UV-based purifier will not be very effective. Inlet water has
to be of a certain minimum quality for a UV system to work. On the other hand,
ultra filtration membranes address all problems.
UV
technology-based companies and membrane technology has a market only where the
water taste is bad (total dissolved solids more than 700). In India, the
biggest problem for most people is bacteriological contamination, as 80 per
cent diseases are water-borne. UV remains the most cost-effective and mass
marketable technology that there is.
AquaGuard,
the most widely sold UV-based purifier comes in two variants — Compact
Cartridge and i-Nova, All players in the industry, however, agree that there is
tremendous scope for expanding the market and that there is room for all. The
compounded annual growth rate of the industry is 20 per cent and growth has
been exhibited even in recessionary times. "If the industry is able to
position water purifiers as customer durables, marketing will become an easier
job," But, as of now, the Indian customer seems to be
content with calling the distributor to have a water purifier installed rather
than visiting the showroom for the same.
1. Eureka
Forbes
Eureka Forbes Limited
is the outcome of joint venture of two renowned industrial giants that is
Forbes Gokak Ltd. and Electrolux AB of Sweden.
It was set up in 1981 to market health and hygiene products to Indian
customers. Till date Forbes group had a
60% holding and Electrolux holds 40% of Eureka Forbes shares. Eureka Forbes started off with one product
employing 20 sales persons and operating in just one location. Today, the organization has grown to become a
Rs. 302 crores enterprise employing over 4000 sales personnel and operating out
of 200 locations.The company revolutionized the Indian market by introducing
products such as vacuum-cleaners (1982), water purifiers (1984) and Air
5
purifiers
(1994).Eureka Forbes is the pioneer in direct selling in India and the name
that is held in esteem and high regard.Eureka Forbes has its manufacturing
facilities at Bhimtal, Hyderabad, and Bangalore together with an advanced
research and development centre at Bangalore.
Eureka Forbes has a service network of over 400-response centre to
provide prompt and efficient after sales services.
Present Status of the Organization
The company started
with a team of 150 sales executives.
Within 10 years the outfit developed in a massive setup with more than
4000 well-trained salesmen. Through
their door to door hard sell, the Eureka Forbes’ sales men now sell more than
one lakh vacuum cleaners and water purifiers per annum bringing in a revenue of
more than Rs.50 crore per year.
Today,
Eureka Forbes Ltd., is Asia’s largest direct sales organization and it brings
over 3 million customers. The very best life has to give clear air, clean
water, and safe and secure homes, but more important is that they bring the
reassurance of a friend. For life.
New
launches of Eureka Forbes:
Eureka Forbes, is now
looking to strengthen its position through a slew of new launches according to
Mr. S.K.Palekar V.P. (Marketing), Eureka Forbes, “Although Eureka Forbes is the
marketing leader in both the categories (with a market share of over 80% in
both the air purifier and vacuum cleaner segment), the company’s new products
will be targeted, at different segment of people.
For instance, the new
Aquaguard Nova priced at Rs.7600 will be targeted at people who have already
had an Aquagurad in their house for more than a year (i.e. approximately a
million people). The product has
electronic features such as an inductor, which will indicate when it is time to
get the service done.
Other launches on the
anvil include a softener model (for areas which get hard water), an arsenic
model, an iron removal model, a fluoride removing model for U.P and Gujarat)
and Aqua power, which can run without electricity.
For the communication
strategy, the company is working on an online model through which it will be
able to interact with customers on the Internet. Eureka Forbes is also planning to
6
increase its number
of call centers from 6 to 10 in one years; meanwhile Eureka Forbes is also
planning to launch an advertisement campaign.
The company has set aside a budget of Rs.15 crores to Rs. 30 crores for
advertising. The company will be ready with faster customer response through
electric contacts by making transaction from distributors to marketers of water
purifier equipments.
Ø
Emerging as preferred employer for youth
Ø
Established as water specialize company
2. KENSTAR
It
is in the business of marketing Home Appliances like Microwave Oven,
Evaporative type Room Air Cooler, Mixer Grinder, Ultra-Violet technology based
domestic Water Purifier and a host of kitchen gadgets like Hand Mixer, Stick
Blender, Iron, Sandwich Toaster, Pizza Maker, Waffle Maker, Citrus Juicer,
Juice Extractor, Coffee Maker and markets these appliances under the brand
name. It was formed in September
1995, has its Corporate Office in Aurangabad. The present Kenstar product range
consists of:
·
Room
Air Conditioners
·
Microwave
Oven
·
Evaporative
type Room Air Cooler
·
Blender
cum Mixer Grinder
·
Water
Purifier based on Ultra-Violet technology
·
Wet
& Dry Mopper (Floor Care Products)
·
Kitchen
Appliances : - Heat Appliances - Blender
juicer
Kenstar has its latest &
state of the art factories in various locations in India. With strengths in
Design, Research & Development, Production, Quality Control & Quality
Assurance, Marketing and Sales, professionals in their respective fields manage
the company. These appliances are manufactured under the most stringent quality
norms and meet the international quality standards (UL&TUL). Kenstar has a
wide distribution network consisting of more than 28 company Sales & Service offices within India. Apart from
the company offices, Kenstar has 160 Authorized Wholesale Dealers (AWD) for
Sales and Service of all the products across the country. These
7
AWDs cover more than 3500 dealer
outlets where one can see, feel and buy the products.
The company has more than 300 Service Franchisees to render service for the Mass Appliances.
The company has more than 300 Service Franchisees to render service for the Mass Appliances.
Water
filter model
3. Bajaj Electricals
Company
Company Profile
Ø Rs 503-crore Bajaj Electricals Ltd—part of the Bajaj
Group—plans to establish the ‘Bajaj’ brand in 15 to 20 countries in the next few years. According to Bajaj
Electricals Ltd chairman and managing director Shekhar Bajaj: “As part of the
strategy, they are planning to spread wings in the international market for
lighting products such as lamps, tubes and water purifiers—from countries such
as South Africa and the Middle-East to other parts of Africa such as Nigeria,
Kenya, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria in 2004. It has lighting and
associated electricals with a market share of above 70 per cent in India,
explained Mr Bajaj.
Ø
Export activities
of Bajaj Electricals are being handled by group company Bajaj
International. Bajaj Electricals Ltd is
now eyeing Thailand to enter into outsourcing arrangements with companies based
there. This is because of certain strategic advantages in terms of cost and
product features. The move is in line with the company’s on-going China
sourcing strategy for components used in domestic appliances in India.
“After having entered into brand licensing and strategic sourcing agreement with UK-based home appliance company, Morphy Richards Ltd, they are now in the process of manufacturing dry irons, oven toaster grillers, mixer grinders and new water purifiers with UV Technology. Plans are on the anvil to implement manufacture of food processors for Morphy Richards in 2004. With the move, Bajaj Electricals plans to become a global supplier of select domestic home appliances to Morphy Richards,” Mr. Ramakrishnan,said. As part of the marketing strategy, Bajaj Electricals is planning to introduce a concept of in-shop branding for ‘Morphy Richards’ brand within 100 premium retail outlets across the country. At present, Bajaj Electricals is in the process of marketing ‘Morphy Richards’ products through 2,000 retail outlets, he added.
Bajaj Electricals is planning to expand its number of retail outlets from 1.25 lakh to 2 lakh
“After having entered into brand licensing and strategic sourcing agreement with UK-based home appliance company, Morphy Richards Ltd, they are now in the process of manufacturing dry irons, oven toaster grillers, mixer grinders and new water purifiers with UV Technology. Plans are on the anvil to implement manufacture of food processors for Morphy Richards in 2004. With the move, Bajaj Electricals plans to become a global supplier of select domestic home appliances to Morphy Richards,” Mr. Ramakrishnan,said. As part of the marketing strategy, Bajaj Electricals is planning to introduce a concept of in-shop branding for ‘Morphy Richards’ brand within 100 premium retail outlets across the country. At present, Bajaj Electricals is in the process of marketing ‘Morphy Richards’ products through 2,000 retail outlets, he added.
Bajaj Electricals is planning to expand its number of retail outlets from 1.25 lakh to 2 lakh
8
within a year. Besides, in the next two years, the
company is also planning to beef up its network from 22,000 retailers to 30,000
retailers,
WATER PURIFIERS OF BAJAJ are
1. Aqua Naturale
2. AQUA LIFE
·
LITRE AQUA LIFE
·
LITRE SILVER SUPREME
4.
MONIBA ANAND ELECTRICAL PVT. LTD. (MA)
Company
Profile
- Established -1989
- Sister concern -ma is a sister concern of waterman industries ltd. Established in 1972
- Turnover present
turnover of group is 24 crores (us$5.7 million)
- Total
employees 288
- Manufacturing plants
waterman
industries ltd.
moniba
anand electrical pvt. Ltd.
mbh
pumps (gujarat) pvt. Ltd.
mbh electrical pvt. Ltd.
- Sales branches 10 sales branches all over india with service
centers
- Distributors -distributor for western part of india are
pulsafeeder electronic metering pump, sole selling distributor for blagdon
pump u.k for all over india.
WATER
PURIFIER MODELS
- U.V.
Water Purifier ABS / Deluxe
- U.V.Top
Small Wonder
- U.V.
Storage Purifier (No Need of Tap Water Supply)
- Online
Purifier cum Cooler 'N' Heater
- Industrial
U.V. Water Purifier
9
CHAPTER-II
2.1 INTRODUCTION
ABOUT THE STUDY
2.1.1 Water Filters & Purification
Clean water is a
matter of universal importance. Like air, water is not a choice: we need it to
survive. So it is deeply disturbing to learn that drinking water is the main
health hazard in India. River water, well and Groundwater are the source of
drinking water for more than half the population, but is it always safe?
Groundwater is not required to be disinfected and can be tainted through
improper wastewater disposal, septic tank contamination, underground storage
tank or landfill leaks or animal waste disposal. Most city water uses treatment
methods that were developed near the turn of the 20th century. Even most
bottled water is drawn from city sources and not filtered in any way! No wonder
millions of customers in India are looking for ways to ensure the water they
use in their homes is safe. Today there are many kinds of home water filters
and purifiers that can remove most pollutants found in city water or from wells
and streams. But deciding which model is the most trustworthy takes time and
research.
To begin our search for the right water filter
or water purifier, we need to follow these steps:
· Have your drinking
water tested, either by professionals or using home test kits. It's a small
investment that will pay for itself!
· Identify which
pollutants are in your water and the type of purifier that will work most
effectively to remove them.
· Decide whether you
prefer 'hard' or mineral-free water. Reverse Osmosis and Steam Distiller units
remove minerals from water.
· Identify the size of
the system you need. Distillation and reverse osmosis products will produce a
limited amount of water per day. Other options may run continuously but require
filters or cartridges that need replacing periodically. Look at your family's
daily volume of water - and double it so that you have enough even in summer seasons.
· Find the best price
with the highest reliability and a dependable warranty.
Increasing public awareness of contaminated drinking water is
creating an "explosion" in this multi-billion dollar drinking water
treatment industry. So many companies throughout India have
10
come up with drinking water systems and filtration solutions for
homes and small businesses. These filters have been used by hospitals, schools,
restaurants, Military, foreign embassies, major airlines, etc.There are
contaminants that can not be easily or affordably treated by public water
treatment plant. Almost everyone that you know will eventually buy a drinking
water treatment system of some kind and most of the people that they know will
do the same. The Drinking Water Treatment industry is exploding, and industry
analysts predict that the industry will grow by 290% by the year 2013.
Importance
of Water Purifiers
Water filters are designed to target specific contaminants. We
must choose a system according to the contaminants that we’re concerned with.
Sometimes these contaminants are easy to detect when their presence is
eminent.Common Symptoms for city or community water: taste and odour,
chlorine, turbidity or hardness.Common Symptoms for well water: taste and
odour, chlorine, turbidity, hardness, iron stains, rotten smell odour (sulfur),
green/blue stains (Low Ph), etc
If we have city water, we can request a water quality analysis
report at a local water authority. This report should show important aspects to
be considered when choosing a water filter like hardness, chlorine level, and
turbidity. If we have well water it is recommended that you test your water for
contaminants. We can use any in home water test kit or we can have a professional
water tester company to test the water. In both cases, city or well water, the
safest way is testing your water and see what contaminants are present and what
needs to be removed.
· Elimination of chlorine
from water
Chlorine can be eliminated by using Carbon Filter Media. It
includes carbon media filtration for the elimination of chlorine. Some of them
are: under sink dual and triple drinking water systems, reverse osmosis
systems, counter top systems, whole house carbon filter, three stage whole house
ultraviolet filtration systems, shower and bath filters.
11
We can use a sediment filter to eliminate sediments (turbidity)
from the water. Sediment filter are usually used as the first stage of drinking
water filters. We can also use a Multimedia Whole House Backwash filter to
eliminate turbidity for the whole house. The multimedia filters are usually
installed in well water applications.
There are many reasons to have a whole house filter, but one of
the most powerful is that we don't just interact with the contaminants in the
water by drinking it but through other medias like the direct contact with our
skin, the water that we use to cook our foods, to make our ice, to make our
home made beverage, even when we are using water for our daily tasks we are
exposed to the inhalation of those contaminant.
Iron can be found in four different forms:
Ferrous Iron: It is often called
"clear iron" and the iron particles are not visible in the water. The
iron particle will rust once they interact with air. This form of iron cannot
be mechanically filtered from the water. It can be treated by ion exchange
using a water softener or water conditioner or a Manganese Greensand Iron
Filter.
Ferric Iron: It is often called "red water iron" and the iron
particles are visible in the water. The iron particles in this case rust when
they are in contact with the water forming solid particles and therefore, they
can be mechanically filtered. This form of iron can be treated with a Manganese
Greensand Iron Filter or with a Backwash Birm Media Filter.
Bacterial Iron: It is often called "pink water iron" and it may not be
visible in the water. However, you may see a reddish/green slime build up where
water is kept for period of time like toilets and bathtub. As its name
indicates, this form of iron is that which has or has had life. This
12
form of iron may need to be treated with chlorine before Manganese
Greensand Iron Filter or Birm Media Backwash Filter is installed.
Colloidal Iron: Very small oxidized
(colloidal size) iron particles are suspended in the water and they may be
combined with organic matters which cause them to repel each other. This form
of iron is visible in the water and it looks similar to the ferric Iron.
Because the iron particles are very small and in suspension, this form of iron
is not mechanically filterable. The water needs to be treated with chlorine
first so the organic matter bound with the iron particles are eliminated and
the iron particles left can flock together in order for conventional
filtration to be applied.
There are several processes that effectively remove or neutralize
Bacteria and other microorganisms. The micro filtration is the process of
removing particles from 0.1 to 0.0002 micron in size and is extremely effective
in removing bacteria, fungal spores, yeast and some viruses since they fall
into this size range. The reverse osmosis process belongs to this category. The
ultraviolet disinfections are also effective in neutralizing microorganisms.
Microbes are destroyed when UV light penetrates the cell wall and cytoplasm
membrane and is absorbed by the nucleic acids. The UV energy rearranges DNA
molecules and prevents the cells from reproducing. It is then considered dead
for all practical purposes. The degree of destruction of microbes is a product
of UV intensity multiplied by contact time. The lower end of macro filtration
filters that have 0.5 micron filtration capabilities are also effective in
removing micro organisms including e-coli bacteria and cyst reduction like
Giardia, Crystospordium and Coliform bacteria which falls into this size
range.
NEW TECHNOLOGY TO
IMPROVE WATER PURIFICATION
·
Ultraviolet Filtration
Systems
Ultraviolet (UV)
technology has been used for more than seven decades to eliminate
disease-causing microorganisms, primarily in industrial and commercial
applications. Today however, this technology is gaining popularity in the residential
sector because:
13
o
It can be applied to almost any water system
o
It adds no chemicals to the water
o
It wastes no water
o
It's inexpensive to maintain
To produce UV energy, electrical current
stimulates mercury vapour held between the electrodes of a fluorescent-like
lamp. The most commonly used UV lamp is a low pressure mercury vapour lamp with
energy output close to 265nm, most effective in killing microbes. Germicidal UV
lamps are made with "hard glass" quartz which transmits 92 percent of
UV energy far more than alternative materials.
Waterborne diseases may be caused by a wide variety of pathogenic
microorganisms. Most are made up of a cell wall, a cytoplasm membrane and a
DNA-bearing nucleic acid. Microbes are destroyed when UV light penetrates the
cell wall and cytoplasm membrane and is absorbed by the nucleic acids. The UV
energy rearranges DNA molecules by permanently altering the genetic makeup and
prevents the cells from reproducing. It's then considered dead for all
practical purposes. The degree of destruction of microbes is a product of UV
intensity multiplied by contact time.
· Activated Carbon
Filtration
Activated carbon filtration is an effective method
of reducing certain organic compounds and chlorine in drinking water. It can
also reduce the quantity of lead, dissolved radon, and harmless taste and odour
causing compounds. The following are the principles, processes and requirements
of activated carbon filtration systems for the domestic (household) user.
Contaminants
removed from water by activated carbon filtration Homeowners are increasingly concerned about
contaminants in their water supply that may affect health or cause taste and
odour problems. Sources of these contaminants might include solvents,
pesticides, industrial wastes or contaminants from leaking underground storage
tanks. Contaminants such as benzene, chlorobenzene, trichloroethylene, carbon
tetrachloride, methylene chloride and vinyl chloride in drinking water may pose
health risks if present in quantities above the EPA Health
14
Advisory
Level (HAL). Activated carbon (AC) filtration can be effective in reducing some
of these organic chemicals as well as certain harmless taste and odour
producing compounds. During disinfection the
reaction of chlorine with organic matter during drinking water chlorination can
produce compounds such as trihalomethanes (THMs) as byproducts. These
disinfection byproducts may increase the risk of certain cancers. The EPA
mandates that public systems have less than 80 parts per billion (ppb) of THMs
in their treated water. Activated carbon filtration can be effective in
removing chlorine and some disinfection byproducts from drinking water.
In addition, lead
from water pipes and joints may be present in water from the tap. AC filtration
can reduce lead in drinking water, though another filter medium is commonly
used in addition to AC for this purpose. Only very specialized AC filters
effectively adsorb heavy metals. Radon, a radioactive decay product of natural
uranium that has been related to lung cancer, can be found in some groundwater.
Radon gas can also be removed by AC filtration though removal rates for
different types of AC equipment have not been established.
Depending on what
part of the country one lives in; it is easy to find trace amounts of nitrates,
pesticides, heavy metals, radioactive compounds, petrochemicals and parasites coming
from the local municipal water supply. The toxins and free radicals in these
waters are made significantly more toxic to humans by the addition of chlorine,
a compound mandated by the public health department. The Environmental
Protection Agency now reports that individuals who drink and bath in
chlorinated surface waters (i.e., water from lakes, rivers and shallow wells)
have a 50% greater likelihood of getting cancer in their lifetime. Most
customers are surprised to learn that one can absorb up to 600% more
contaminants in your body in a ten-minute shower than in all the water consumed
in a day. Because of such contaminants, two out of every five households now
have a water filter or drink bottled water, with no assurance of safety. The
problem is that the average customer and even most medical professionals do not
know what the best way to treat water is or the best source of water to drink.
15
Water
is said to be the essence of life. Everyone knows that the human body can
survive without water only a matter of days. However, today's water supply is
either contaminated or wrought with chemicals to prevent contamination. These
processes for removing contamination also destroy the original
"structure" of water like that found in nature. Nature imparts on
water a unique structure that closely interacts with the Earth's natural paramagnetic force. It is this force that gives rivers its oscillating
snake-like appearance. It is this structure that gives water "life".
Living water is that which has been structured by nature and carries the
life-giving force the body needs.
16
2.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
We will be studying the water
filter consumers in terms of demographic details (age, occupation, income);
Psychographics (purchase decision, perception of competing brands and its
match with their own personality
etc). The primary purpose of this project is to examine the factors that affect
Ø
The
factors which affect the purchase decision
Ø
Buying
behavior of different segments
Ø
In-depth
analysis of important attributes, which can help in serving the customers
2.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
Ø
To understand the
customer preferences towards water purifiers.
Ø
To know the effective
medium which creates awareness about the product
Ø
To determine the
customer satisfaction level.
Ø
To know the key
factors which influencing the purchase decision.
Ø To give suitable findings, suggestions and recommendations
to further growth of water purifier
2.4 SCOPE OF THE
STUDY
The scope
of the study is to know the level of satisfaction of customer with respect to
product and services of different company’s water purifiers. This study is
aiming to know the best marketing strategy. It also aims to know the brand
awareness and brand performance for different brands of water purifiers in the
market.
2.5 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
Ø
Sample
size has been restricted for convenience purpose.
Ø
Personal
biases may affect the accuracy of the data.
Ø
Finally
the study is time bound and does not respond to changes in the market, prices
of current brands and introduction of new brands, therefore it may loose it
authenticity over a period of time.
17
2.6 REVIEW OF
LITERATURE
Ø
Earlier
definitions of brand image are presented in broad terms by Dobni (1990) who put
forward the following writers understanding of brand image. Newman stated it as
“everything the people associate with the brand” (1957). Reynolds (1965)
confirms that an image was centered on drawing a few key beliefs from a vast
variety of sources, thus creating your own impression based on the brand.
Herzog’s concurs that brand image was “the sum of the total
impressions.”(1973). Indeed, such definitions all concur together; echoed by
the words of Levy who stated that “a brand image is a constellation of pictures
and ideas in people’s minds that sum up their knowledge of the brand and their
main attitudes towards it” (1978). A
more recent insight into brand image was added by Woodside who “defined image
as the degree of positive or negative affect associated with psychological
object” (Reid, 2001).
Ø
From
these definitions a clear trend is appearing with regard to the perception of
brand image with key figures around the mid-nineteen hundreds, supporting a collective
view that an individual takes in a collaboration of ideas that the company puts
forward as a representation of themselves. This allows them to draw a clear
conclusion of a company from a few certain points which strike a cord with the
individuals.
Ø
According
to Tyler (1957), there are three approaches to brand image: Subjective,
Objective and Literal. The first type, is a subjective image, this is when a
potential customer hears or sees the brand name/logo and feel obliged to
purchase the product or service, despite a lack of understanding as to why this
is the case. The case simply relates to how the brand is perceived as
significant to an individual’s self-consciousness. The second type of brand
image is the objective form which is the attempt to generate an emotional need
for the product, leaving you with the feeling that you need to purchase the
product so as to satisfy this need. The third is literal image, i.e. a logo
which represents a company. This implies that upon seeing this picture/logo,
the name of the company does not need to be uttered as the picture tells the
consumer the whole story e.g. Nike with the tick or McDonalds with the golden
arches. Evidently, the approach used to obtain and sustain a brand image will
vary upon several factors as reflected by the analysis presented by Tyler.
18
Ø
Oxenfeldt
and Swann’s idea was that the brand image should allow the company to establish
its position within its market segment, protecting it from competition, thus
allowing them to build upon this with market share growth (Park et al,
1986).Moreover Park et al (1986) put forward in Bhat’s article that the
importance of establishing a brand image relevant to its market segment in
which it is based, is significant so as to ascertain a strong brand position,
help create a barrier to entry for potential competitors: thus raise the brands
performance in the market.
Ø
Further,
Meenaghan stated that “at the product/brand level the components of identity
are in effect the elements of the marketing mix, which combine to form the
image of the brand in the mind of the consumer” (1995). From this, it is clear
that to gain a strong brand image, one needs to exploit all areas of the
marketing mix to achieve what Oxenfeldt and Swann stressed and that brand image
is the key component in establishing market dominance. Also, Krishman (1996) in
Faircloth’s assessment with the aid of the Landor survey discovered that there
is a strong correlation between brand equity and brand image. The stronger the
brand equity, the stronger the brand image and vice versa.
Ø
Reid’s
(2001) understanding of brand image concerns the product of interaction
involving the consumer’s specific experience with a certain brand, helped by
advertising which reveals how the brand is to be understood and used,
predominantly for brands that contend at parity. Another contemporary
understanding of brand image was put forward by Hsieh (2002), who felt that
building a brand image based on the identified benefit-based image dimensions
consisted of a set of benefit brand associations. This helped consumers
understand with clarity what a brand can do for them-symbolically,
economically, sensorial or as a utility. White and Hsieh (2002) seem to
recognize the key importance that advertising plays in promoting the elements
of a brand image thus differentiating the brand from rival brands, giving them
a competitive advantage.
19
2.7 RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
INTRODUCTION
Research
methodology prepares the investigator to adopt techniques and tools to neutralize
the description, explanation and justification of various methods of continuing
research. In this section the researcher attempts to study the
Consumer Preferences
in buying Water Purifiers. Research
methodology contains the research design, universe, tool of data collection,
method of data analysis, period of study, pre-test etc
Research
design
The research design used in the study was descriptive study.
Universe
This study was conducted in Kottayam city. The total
population was above 200000. Among the
total population the researcher collected 100 samples for the study.
Primary
data
The primary data was obtained by personal
interviews at Kottayam district through questioners.
Secondary
data
Secondary
data collected by books journals, company past record & Internet.
Sample
method
In this given
project, simple random sample was used. Here, the survey was done by filling
the questionnaire from the randomly selected customers out of the list of
population of customer database. The sample size was fixed as 100.
Method
of analysis:
The
steps involved during the given project are as follows:
Questionnaire was prepared considering
the objectives of the study, Survey was conducted by meeting the customers of
the company from the questionnaire; table and graphs have been
20
prepared
which are analyzed in the next chapter. From the analysis conclusions and
suggestions were drawn.
Pilot survey
The researcher conducted a pilot study before
the data collection. The researcher visited the organization and discussed with
the authority of the organization before the data collection.
Pretesting
To
test the efficiency of the tool of data
collection, a pretest was conducted among ten respondents. As per the feedback
received, necessary modifications were made.
Method
of data analysis
After collecting the data using questionnaire the
researcher transferred the data into coding sheet. Later the data were
tabulated into simple table and analyzed with the help of statistical tools
like chi-square, correlation and interpreted data.
Period
of study
The duration taken by the
researcher for the data collection and analysis regarding the brand image of Eureka Forbes Ltd, Kottayam
for three months from 28-3-2010 to 20-5-2010.
21
CHAPTER-3
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Table 1
The age-wise breakup
of the sample size.
No. of Respondents
|
|
20-30
|
33
|
30-40
|
39
|
40-50
|
17
|
50 and above
|
11
|
Total
|
100
|
|
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph 1
Inference:
From the above graph
we can infer that most of the consumers are influenced by the family members
and their health, considering their stage in the family lifecycle. i.e. age
group 30-40 yrs and 20-30 years. The age group 20-30 years may also imply a new
earning member in the family.
22
Table 2
Qualifications of the customers
No. of Respondents
|
|
S.S.L.C
|
38
|
Under Graduate
|
44
|
Post Graduation
|
18
|
Ph.D
|
0
|
Total
|
100
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 2
GRAPH SHOWS EDUCATION
OF RESPONDENTS
Inference:
Here
we can observe that the level of education has a role to play in the purchase
decision considering that most of the consumers are graduates. Thus social and
health awareness plays a part in the buying behavior of the consumers.
23
Table 3
Occupations of the customers interviewed
No. of Respondents
|
|
Govt. Officials
|
12
|
Pvt officials
|
29
|
Own business
|
55
|
Retired
|
4
|
Total
|
100
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph 3
Graph shows Occupations of the customers interviewed
Inference:
It is clear that the majority of the
consumers were those having their own business and the people working in
private companies came second. We can imply that their job status has a part in
the buying decision.
24
Table 4
Income levels of the customers interviewed
No. of Respondents
|
|
1000-5000
|
11
|
5000-10000
|
33
|
10000-20000
|
41
|
20000-30000
|
13
|
More Than 30000
|
2
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph 4
Inference:
We
can observe that the high income levels do not mean that the consumers are
ready to spend. But the consumers in the income bracket of Rs 5000 – Rs 20000 per month are the most
likely to buy.
25
Table 5
Customer’s preference and usage of water purifiers
No. of Respondents
|
|
Eureka Forbes
|
42
|
Kenstar
|
31
|
Moniba
|
6
|
Usha
|
8
|
Resiline
|
4
|
Bajaj
|
5
|
Others
|
4
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph
5
GRAPH SHOWS PREFERENCES OF WATER
PURIFIER
Inference: Customers’ preference lies towards Eureka Forbes and almost all
the customers preferred it. This also shows the trust and brand image the
company commands. Kenstar came a close second while the others are almost
unknown to the market.
26
Table 6
Features affecting the purchase decision of water
purifier
Sl.No
|
Features
|
No.
of respondents
|
1
|
Quality
|
18
|
2
|
Brand name
|
16
|
3
|
Availability
|
18
|
4
|
Price
|
18
|
5
|
Packaging
|
13
|
6
|
After sales service
|
17
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 6:GRAPH SHOWS RESPONDENTS OPINION
ON FEATURES THAT ARE CONSIDERED WHILE PURCHASING “WATER PURIFIER”
Inference:
All the customers said that
quality, availability and price are the most important features that they
considered while purchasing a water purifier. The next important features
mentioned are after sales services, brand name and packaging. Since the
customers regarded quality as an important feature while purchasing a water
purifier, they were asked if they checked for the ISI mark before purchasing a
product
27
Table 7
The familiarity of the water purifiers
Company
|
No. of Respondents
|
Eureka
Forbes
|
44
|
Kenstar
|
34
|
Moniba
|
6
|
Usha
|
7
|
Resiline
|
4
|
Bajaj
|
5
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 7
GRAPH SHOWS FAMILIARISED WITH SOME OF
THE WATER PURIFIERS
Inference:
More than 75% of
customers familiarized with Eureka Forbes and Kenstar
28
Table 8
Respondents’ preferences for source of information about water
purifier
Sl.No
|
Mode
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Through
advertisement
|
21
|
2
|
Relatives
|
12
|
3
|
Through
word of mouth
|
23
|
4
|
Through
sales executives
|
41
|
5
|
Company
image
|
3
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 8
Inference:
Around 41% of
customers prefer sales executives as the best source for getting information
about the water purifiers. Behind their minds, they think that they can get
answers for every question through this source. Word of mouth and Advertisement
also can be good source of information.
29
Hypothesis:
H0 – sales
executives are the most important source of information. (50% of customers find
out about product through sales executives.)
H1 – sales executives are not the most important source
of information.
Analysis:
Z =
-
/
Z = 0.41-0.5/ h(0.5*(0.5)/100)
Z = -1.8
I zcali < zk 0.025 =1.96
Value
is significant enough to say that ho is acceptable.
Inference:
It is
significant that sales executives are the most important source of information
(50% of customers find out about product through sales executives.)
30
Table 9
Some of the main criteria while choosing water purifier
Sl.No
|
Products
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Price
|
26
|
2
|
Discount sales
|
24
|
3
|
Various scheme
|
22
|
4
|
28
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph 9
CHART SHOWING MAIN CRITERIA CHOOSING
“WATER PURIFIER”
Inference:
All customers said
that the main criterion for choosing a product was the price of the product and
the discounts being offered.28% of the customers felt that brand name was
important while choosing the product.22% said that their choice depended on the
various schemes that were being offered to the customers by the companies. Indians are price sensitive. Therefore,
purchasing decisions are mainly driven by considerations of prices and
discounts.
31
Table 10
Preferences of schemes during festival season.
Sl.No
|
Products
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Discount facility
|
26
|
2
|
Installment facility
|
25
|
3
|
Credit facility
|
26
|
4
|
Others
|
15
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 10 GRAPH SHOWING PREFERENCES OF
SCHEMES DURING FESTIVAL SEASON”
Inference:
Most of the customers
believe that discount facility during festival season is the best scheme. All
customers said that they would like to have discount facilities offered to them
during festival seasons. 97% and 96% of the customers wanted credit facilities
and installment facilities being offered during festival seasons.
32
Table 11
Customer knowledge about a sales promotion scheme
Company
|
No. of Respondents
|
Eureka Forbes
|
45
|
Kenstar
|
31
|
Moniba
|
8
|
Usha
|
9
|
Resiline
|
3
|
Bajaj
|
4
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph 11
Graph showing Customer knowledge about a sales promotion scheme
Inference:
More Advertisement
needs to be done to inform the consumer about the festival schemes or other
sales promotion especially by the companies other than Eureka Forbes and
Kenstar.
33
Table 12
Customers’ purchase of the water purifier
No. of Respondents
|
|
Eureka Forbes
|
44
|
Kenstar
|
33
|
Moniba
|
6
|
Usha
|
7
|
Resiline
|
3
|
Bajaj
|
4
|
Others
|
3
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph12
Inference: 44% of customers bought the Eureka Forbes product, 33% of
customers bought Kenstar product. This implies the other players in the market
have to market their products more aggressively and need to look into getting
more publicity for their products.
34
Hypothesis:
H0 – Eureka Forbes controls 50% of the market (ho: p=0.5)
H1 – Eureka Forbes does not control 50% of the market
Analysis:
Z =
-
/
Z=0.44-0.5/ h(0.5*(0.5)/100)
Z=-1.2
I zcali < zk
0.025 =1.96
Value
is significant enough to say that ho is acceptable.
Inference:
It is
significant that Eureka Forbes controls 50% of the market
35
Table 13
Customers who bought in festival Season
Sl.No
|
No.
of Respondents
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
1
|
49
|
51
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph 13
Inference:
Only 49% of the
customer bought the product in festival season, which means more advertisement
is needed for festival schemes and still better offers need to be devised by
the companies to take advantage of the festive season.
36
Hypothesis:
H0 – 50% of customers bought in the festive season (ho:
p=0.5)
H1 – 50% of customers have not bought in the festive
season
Analysis:
Z =
-
/
Z=0.49-0.05/
h(0.5*(0.5)/100)
Z=-0.2
I zcali < zk
0.025 =1.96
Value
is significant enough to say that ho is acceptable.
Inference:
It is
significant that 50% of customers bought in the festive season
37
Table 14
Respondents’ preferences of sources for buying water purifiers
Sl.No
|
Mode
|
No.
of respondents
|
1
|
Dealer
|
36
|
2
|
Direct sales
|
41
|
3
|
Retail shop
|
23
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 14
Inference:
41% of the
respondents prefer direct sales as the best source for buying water purifiers,
followed by dealers at 36%. Hence the companies need to concentrate more on
direct sales than on any other mode of sales.
38
Hypothesis:
H0 – 50% of customers buy through direct selling (ho:
p=0.5)
H1 – 50% of customers do not buy through direct selling
Analysis:
Z =
-
/
Z=0.41-0.5/ h(0.5*(0.5)/100)
Z=-1.8
I zcali < zk 0.025 =1.96
Value
is significant enough to say that ho is acceptable.
Inference:
It is
significant that 50% of customers buy through direct selling
39
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Null
Hypothesis H0 :
Alternative
Hypothesis H1:
There is a significant relation
between Mode of buying and the source of information.
Analysis:
Cross tabulating table -8 and table-14
Table 8
Sl.No
|
Source
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Through advertisement
|
21
|
2
|
Relatives
|
12
|
3
|
Through word of mouth
|
23
|
4
|
Through sales executives
|
41
|
5
|
Company image
|
3
|
Table -14
Sl.No
|
Mode
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Dealer
|
36
|
2
|
Direct sales
|
41
|
3
|
Retail shop
|
23
|
40
Observed Frequency:
Particulars
|
Dealer
|
Direct sales
|
Retail shop
|
Total
|
Advertisement
& company image
|
12
|
8
|
4
|
24
|
Relatives
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
12
|
Through
word of mouth
|
7
|
5
|
11
|
23
|
Through
sales
|
12
|
23
|
6
|
41
|
Total
|
36
|
41
|
23
|
100
|
Expected Frequency:
Particulars
|
Dealer
|
Direct sales
|
Retail shop
|
Total
|
Advertisement & company image
|
8.64
|
9.84
|
5.52
|
24
|
Relatives
|
4.32
|
4.92
|
2.76
|
12
|
Through word of mouth
|
8.28
|
9.43
|
5.29
|
23
|
Through sales
|
14.76
|
16.81
|
9.43
|
41
|
Total
|
36
|
41
|
23
|
100
|
Chi Square Test=Χ2= K ∑ i=1 (Oi-Ei)2/Ei
Oi=observed number of cases categorized in the ith category
Ei=expected number of cases in the ith category under Ho
K=the number of categories
Degrees of freedom= k-1(single sample)
Degrees of freedom= (r-1) (c-1) (two sample)
41
= (4-1) (3-1)
= 6
Table
value at 5% level of satisfaction is 12.59
O
|
E
|
(O-E)2
|
(O-E)2/E
|
12
|
8.64
|
11.29
|
1.3
|
8
|
9.84
|
3.39
|
.34
|
4
|
5.52
|
2.31
|
.42
|
5
|
4.32
|
.46
|
.1
|
5
|
4.92
|
.08
|
.016
|
2
|
2.76
|
.58
|
.21
|
7
|
8.28
|
1.64
|
.198
|
5
|
9.43
|
19.62
|
2.08
|
11
|
5.29
|
32.6
|
6.16
|
12
|
14.76
|
7.62
|
.52
|
23
|
16.81
|
38.32
|
2.28
|
6
|
9.43
|
11.76
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
14.874
|
Χ2 CAL =14.8722955
Χ2 6, 0.05 =12.59
Therefore Χ2 CAL > Χ2 6, 0.05
Therefore Value is significant enough to say that H1 is acceptable.
Conclusion:
Mode of buying is influenced by the source of
information
From the table it is clear that the sales
executives’ affect the buying behaviour.
42
Table 15
Mode of payment
Sl.No
|
Customer
Payment Mode
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Cash
|
36
|
2
|
Cheque
|
27
|
3
|
Installment
|
14
|
4
|
Credit card
|
23
|
5
|
Credit
|
0
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph 15
Inference:
36% of the customer
purchased through cash and 27% purchased through cheque.
43
Table 16
Customers’ opinion regarding the pricing of the water
purifier.
Sl.No
|
Price
Tag
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Very high
|
59
|
2
|
Reasonable
|
34
|
3
|
Low
|
7
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 16
Inference:
34% of the customers felt that the prices of the purifier were
reasonable, 7% opined that the prices were lower as compared to the other
similar products available in the market. However, 59% of the customers said
that the prices of water purifier were high. This shows the price sensitivity
of the customers interviewed. Hence cost cutting has to be thought of seriously
by the companies involved.
44
Table 17
Satisfaction level of customers with the overall performance of
water purifier.
Sl.No
|
Satisfaction
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Extremely satisfied
|
33
|
2
|
Very much satisfied
|
46
|
3
|
Satisfied
|
21
|
4
|
Dissatisfied
|
0
|
5
|
Very bad
|
0
|
Source: Primary Data.
Graph 17
Inference:
More than 46%
customers are very much satisfied with the product and followed by
exceptionally satisfied 33%. This means that the customers are happy about
their purchase and thereby are assured of the quality of the product. This could
result in good opinion to other prospective buyers through word of mouth.
45
Table 18
Relationship with the company executives
Sl.No
|
Satisfaction
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Excellent
|
0
|
2
|
Good
|
39
|
3
|
Average
|
61
|
4
|
Fair
|
0
|
5
|
Poor
|
0
|
Source:
Primary Data.
Graph 18
Inference:
Majority of the customers interviewed rate the relationship as
“average”. Since direct sales are one of the most preferred modes of purchase,
the relationship needs to be improved.
46
Table 19
The effectiveness of the competitors in advertising the products
Company
|
No. of Respondents
|
Eureka Forbes
|
57
|
Kenstar
|
25
|
Moniba
|
3
|
Usha
|
6
|
Resiline
|
3
|
Bajaj
|
6
|
Source:
Primary Data
Graph 19
Inference:
Kenstar is the main
competitor for the market leader Eureka Forbes. but the competition from
the rest of companies seems to be
non-existent.
47
Table 20
Customers’ preferences of frequent visits by company’s sales
personnel
Sl.No
|
Contact
from company personnel
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Monthly
|
2
|
2
|
Quarterly
|
22
|
3
|
Half yearly
|
49
|
4
|
Yearly
|
27
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 20
Inference:
49% of the customers
think that quarterly visit by the sales personnel is better, followed by 27%
for yearly.
48
Table 21
Satisfaction with companies after sales service
Sl.No
|
Satisfaction
with companies after sales services
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Exceptionally satisfied
|
0
|
2
|
Very much satisfied
|
34
|
3
|
Satisfied
|
61
|
4
|
Dissatisfied
|
4
|
5
|
Very bad
|
1
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 21
Inference:
More than 50%
customers are satisfied with the product and after sales service, followed by
unsatisfied 23% of the customers. There is still scope for improvement in after
sales service.
49
Table 22
The classification of the respondents based on the expected time
within which repair has to be done.
Sl.No
|
Attending
repairs
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
24 hrs
|
40
|
2
|
72 hrs
|
35
|
3
|
Week
|
16
|
4
|
Fortnight
|
9
|
5
|
Month
|
0
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 22
Inference:
In case of any
problem in water purifier, majority of the respondents i.e. 40% prefer to get
the water purifier repaired within 24 hrs. It is quite understood that
customers always look for quicker responses.
50
Table 23
Changing of water filters which is prescribed by the company
Changing
Of
Water filters
|
No.
of Respondents
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
23
|
77
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 23
Inference:
Only 23% of the
customers change the water filters as prescribed by the company. Hence
customers need to be educated more about the importance of changing the filters
and the ill effects of not changing it.
51
Table 24
Customers propose to change the purifiers after
Sl.No
|
Propose
to change after
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
2 years
|
0
|
2
|
3 years
|
3
|
3
|
5 years
|
31
|
4
|
10 years
|
66
|
5
|
Not required
|
0
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 24
Inference:
66% of the customers
propose to change after 10 years and 31% customers propose to change after 5
years. We can conclude that customers do not prefer to change the water
purifier early. They look at it as durable product. The more enduring the
better.
52
Table 25
Post purchase behaviour of customers
Sl.No
|
Post
purchase experience
|
No.
of Respondents
|
1
|
Excellent
|
6
|
2
|
Good
|
88
|
3
|
Average
|
6
|
4
|
Fair
|
0
|
5
|
Poor
|
0
|
Source: Primary Data
Graph 25
Inference:
Majority of the customers interviewed rate the purifier as “good”.
This indicates that
water purifier is performing well and getting good response from the customers.
53
CHAPTER-IV
FINDINGS & SUGGESTIONS
4.1
SUMMERY OF FINDINGS
The study was
undertaken with an objective to provide an insight on water purifier provided
by many companies and the main objective is to find customer preferences and
buying behaviour of water purifier.
In the course of
carrying the study the following aspects were observed:
v
By thorough investigation it was found that a direct sale is the
most effective source of selling water purifiers.
v
Nearly 41% of respondents were in the income group of 10000 to
20000 per month.
v
Majority of respondents chose information from sales executives
and Word of mouth played an most important
role in purchasing the water purifier
v
More than 80% of the respondents feel that the main feature which
were considered while purchasing the products were quality, price and brand
name.
v
Majority of sales executives prefer direct sale as the best
strategy because in this strategy they can directly reach out the customer and
can create the awareness of the product by answering their queries and giving
information about products.
v
It is found that only direct selling is not enough because selling
through dealership is also more effective and efficient.
v
It is found that festival seasons does not affect the sale of
water purifier
v
Majority of the customers prefer discount facility scheme as the
best scheme if they get any schemes in festival season.
v
More than 80% of customers were satisfied with overall performance
of water purifiers.
v
It was found that the company’s sales personnel meet the
complaints within 24 Hrs. which is a challenging service.
v
Companies are adopting different modes of attraction
54
v
Companies should increase Research and Development activities
because customers are looking for modern and latest technology and different
designs in the products.
v
More than 90% of the respondents feel that quality of the product
is good.
v
More than 40% of the respondents feel that overall performance of
the water purifier is very much satisfactory.
v
In
purchase of a product or service, there are few influential people who
influence the buyers’ decision making. This question helps us to find the
people who will influence the purchasing.
It is clear from the table and graph that Advertisement, Discount sale,
direct sale etc. are the front-runners in influencing the decision-making process.
v
More than 85% of respondents were satisfied in their post purchase
behavior.
v
Most of the respondents were available at different times due to
their busy work but they were helpful in the completion of my project in a
successful way.
4.2 SUGGESTIONS
v
Only Eureka Forbes is following direct sales as the best strategy
for their marketing. This marketing strategy has been very effective but other
companies also need to follow and every company should concentrate more on
direct selling and dealership marketing which increases the awareness and
importance of water purification.
v
Indian customers generally make higher purchases during festival
seasons; hence the companies should give package deal to increase the sales.
v
Companies should consider manufacturing of water purifiers for
lower middle class families that is at a price which is affordable.
v
Among all the promotion schemes, customers prefer discount scheme
as the most effective one so companies should offer the scheme at least once in
a year.
v
Companies should concentrate more on advertisement both through
print and electronic media which would help to increase awareness program on
health and hygiene.
v
There should be periodic meeting with prospective customers, which
would help in customer loyalty.
55
v
The company should go for promotional campaigns in schools,
colleges, hospitals, religious places, and meeting halls for creating positive
awareness of safe purified drinking water.
v
Companies should participate in social service and thereby gain
publicity.
v
Sometimes it may be hard to believe the reasons the customer has
given for his satisfaction or dissatisfaction conditions. So companies may
conduct market research periodically at least once in six months.
v
Companies should participate in trade fairs and customer fairs
doing which will increase the sales and brand awareness among the mass which
definitely influences the buying of water purifiers.
v
Companies should think of marketing strategy for boosting export
and increase market share.
v
Customer must be communicated at every stage of sales encounter
because better communication gives better results
v
Price of the water purifier is an important factor for the
customer value and also competition, organization has to impact necessary care
to give discounts and gain competitive advantage.
v
Giving the customers better financial options would increase the
sales
v
Companies have not been into much of promotional activities, it
is time to promote in better manner to
position itself in the minds of customers
v
Customer feedback and suggestions should be given first priority
to increase customer loyalty.
56
CHAPTER-V
5.1 CONCLUSION
ü
For a company to create a leadership atmosphere in a nation where
everyday a new competitor will come to light is a very difficult and committed
task.
ü
When it comes to marketing strategy and brand awareness used by
Eureka Forbes particularly towards the water purifier, it is very effective and
dependent on one source i.e., direct sales
ü
Nowadays dealership marketing is becoming more popular and less
risky as compared to the direct selling because in the latter the company will take every risk to attract
customers and to maintain the good relationship and loyalty, but in case of
dealership this responsibility partly decentralizes among company and dealers.
ü
Companies should also concentrate on dealership because it has to
send its product to such a place where direct selling is not possible and
direct control cannot be done. So it should concentrate on different channels
of marketing.
ü
Many companies are still concentrating only on upper/upper middle
class but not on lower middle class which can provide a large market if they
have a water purifier within their reach.
ü
In India the importance of purified water is not understood by the
people except educated society, so the companies should do everything to fill
up this information gap so that it can have a potential market as well as a
social satisfaction.
ü
More concentration towards after sales service needs to be
implemented.
ü
Still quality has to be increased with 100% safe and free to drink
water with Economical price.
57
APPENDIX
QUESTIONNAIRE
Please tick all that
is applicable to you
1).
NAME:___________________________
2).
ADDRESS:________________________
3).
AGE
20-30 years
|
30-40 years
|
40-50 years
|
50 & above
|
|
|
|
|
4).
QUALIFICATION
S.S.L.C
|
Under Graduate
|
Post Graduate
|
Ph.D
|
|
|
|
|
5).
OCCUPATION
Govt. Employee
|
Private Concern
|
Own business
|
Retired
|
Student
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6). INCOME GROUP PER MONTH
Nil
|
|
1000-5000
|
|
5001-10000
|
|
10001-20000
|
|
20001-30000
|
|
More than
30000
|
|
58
7) What purifier do you prefer and use?
8).
What are the features considered by you while purchasing
Water Purifier
9).
Which of the Water
Purifiers are you familiar with
Eureka
Forbes Kenstar Moniba
10).
How did you first come to know about Water Purifier
Through Advertisement Relatives Company Image
Others__________
11).
What are the main criteria for choosing a Water Purifier
59
12).
Do you think company should provide attractive schemes during
festival season
If yes, which scheme do you prefer?
13).
Do you think any company
has such sales promotion scheme
Yes
|
|
No
|
|
If yes then
Which
company_________________
14).
Which water purifier you purchased?
Eureka Forbes Kenstar Moniba
15).
Did you buy in festive
season?
16).
How did you buy the water
purifier
17).
How did you pay
18).
What do you feel about the price tag of the water purifier
Very high Reasonable Low
60
19).
Are you satisfied with the overall performance of the water
purifier
Extremely satisfied Very much
satisfied
Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Very Bad
20).
How is the relation ship with the company executives?
Excellent Good Average
Fair Poor
21).
Which company gives maximum advertising support?
22).
Do you think visit/telephone by the company’s personnel for
routine check up is necessary?
If
Yes, how frequently?
23).
Are you satisfied with the companies’ after sales services?
Extremely satisfied Very
much satisfied Satisfied
Not satisfied Very Bad
24).
When does company attend to your repairs? Within
25).
Do you change the filter as prescribed by the company?
61
26).
When do you propose to change the purifier? After
27).
What is your post purchase experience about the water purifier?
Excellent Good Average Fair Poor
62
REFERENCE
A. Books & Journals
1.
C.R. Kothari (2009).Research Methodology, 2nd edition, New Age International
(P) Limited, New Delhi.
2.
S. P. Gupta (2008).Statistical Methods, 37th
edition, Sultan Chand & Sons, New Delhi.
3.
Michael R. Czinkota
& Llkka A. Ronkainen (2008). International
Marketing, 4th edition, Change Learning India Private Limited,
New Delhi.
4.
U. C. Mathur (2008).Brand Management,. 2nd
edition, Rajiv Beri for Macmillan India Limited, New Delhi.
5.
Leon G. Schiffman
& Leslie Lazar Kanuk (2007). Consumer
Behavior, 9th edition, Dorling Kindersly (India) Pvt. Ltd, New
Delhi.
B.
Websites
- www.eurekaforbes.com
- www.purityplanet.com
- www.kenstar.com
It's a interesting article. I'll come back soon for more.
ReplyDeleteBioglobe Singapore Pte Ltd
Tnq you
ReplyDeleteYou are sharing very interesting information.
ReplyDeleteCommercial Ro Wholesale Market In Delhi
Hello, thanks for sharing such a nice information of top brand of water purifier.I am thinking of buying purifier from one of the best electronic store in pimpri chinchwad.Which is one of the best shop for electronic home applience.Get in touch with us.
ReplyDelete